Understanding what building and maintaining legitimacy means today, Discover how you can achieve public impact using a tried and tested, simple framework, Read all our reports that explore we can shape a new future for government, Read how leaders are transforming lives and achieving public impact through these honest and personal reflections, Examples of public policy succeeding or failing, drawing out the key lessons for future policy work, Working with Collaborate and the University of Northumbria to reveal a complexity friendly approach to public services, Working with Frontline and Buurtzorg UK & Ireland to explore a radical approach to childrenâs social care in England, Working with Changing Lives to understand how government could be listening more inclusively, Working with the OECD Observatory of Public Sector Innovation to gather innovative approaches in response to the Coronavirus, Working with Engage Britain to showcase some of the most innovative ways people, policy and technology can work together, Working with Aspen Institute to explore how US cities are innovating with intention to achieve impact, Working with the Aspen Institute Center for Urban Innovation to build a framework for fostering innovation in the public sector, Working with the Beeck Center for Social Impact + Innovation to create a tool for evaluating an investment's potential for positive impact, Working with Mastercard Center for Inclusive Growth to create a global framework for building inclusive economies, What we do, how we work, who and where we are, Our worldwide team, as well as our Board, Fellows and Peopleâs Panel, Come reimagine government - explore our current vacancies. For the 2006 census, respondents were allowed to complete all questions in either English or Māori. Stats NZ use the category âEuropean New Zealandâ, while many online commentators preferred âNew Zealanderâ, and others wanted âPÄkehÄâ a MÄori term for New Zealanders of European descent, while yet others suggested âTauiwiâ, a term for any non-MÄori person born in New Zealand. It will also examine issues that arise in monitoring Māori health and Learn more about the Fundamentals and how you can use them to access your own policies and initiatives. The 2018 Census was held on 6 March 2018. Consultation on gender identity also revealed a high level of interest in collecting relevant data. The Loomio team therefore provided support in summarising and adapting this material to ensure it was accessible and engaging. âThe âNew Zealander' responses decreased from 10.9 percent to 1.6 percent between the 2006 and 2013 censuses. For a fuller discussion of ethnicity data in the population census over time see, for example, Brown 1983, Statistics New Zealand 1999, or the accompanying discussion paper ‘The politics and practice of counting’ (Cormack 2010) (available on the website www.ethnicity.maori.nz). The New Zealand Census of Population and Dwellings was due to take place in 2018, five years after it was last held in 2013. [11] This is a particular issue in relation to data provided by MÄori respondents, whose response rate is predicted to be as low as 70 or 80 percent. The discussions were organised around key themes and divided into the following 12 topic areas, Each topic area was further divided into individual discussion subtopics: for example, âEthnicity, culture and identityâ included 11 discussion subtopics, such as ethnicity, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, and gender identity. This would include the provision of hospitals, kohanga reo (kindergartens where lessons are conducted in MÄori), schools, roads, public transport, and recreational facilities. Inadequate operational resourcing and staffing levels have been blamed for the low completion rate. [5], Stats NZ appointed a project manager to oversee and administer the process of public engagement, and one interviewee involved in the delivery of the project described how they employed younger and more tech-savvy people to support them. Therefore, we will not include this topic in the 2018 Census. But there is a difference between NZ Europeans and Europeans born elsewhere. [2][3], In late 2014, Stats NZ tested potential questions within their team. You can go back to Q 2 also) I’m American/Canadian/South African/Irish (you’re an immigrant, back to question 2) _____ Notes: technically, NZ is bicultural, in other words, if you’re not Maori, you’re … In reimagining government, we must commit to centering historically underrepresented communities voices in all of the work that we do. Māori respondents were asked to identify whether they were 'Maori' or 'Maori half-caste'. This process was open to all citizens, who could make formal suggestions directly to Stats NZ, either as individuals or as organisations. It gives public servants the ability to paint a picture that, because there was no or little response from some of these MÄori communities, no one lives there and therefore it's a perfect excuse to withdraw services.â[9]Â, During the public engagement stage, the use of technology both in engaging the public and hosting discussions was considered to increase the efficiency and significantly reduce costs and barriers when compared with the traditional approaches of print media engagement and town hall meetings. Since the introduction of the ethnic group question in the 1991 census, a growing share of the New Zealand population has reported belonging to … New Zealand, 3% in a Pacific Island country and 7% in Asia). application/pdf … The CPI team shares what weâre learning about the future of government. In the data collected, the non-heterosexual populations were smaller than the number of respondents who did not answer the question or indicated they preferred not to answer it. The report also describes the Stats NZ team as having the courage and willingness to try different things, while Loomio was described as providing ongoing, detailed and thoughtful support. In addition to online deliberative engagement, Stats NZ ran a series of face-to-face seminars and stakeholder workshops in Auckland, Christchurch, Dunedin, Hamilton and Wellington in May 2015. A analysis of statistical … endstream endobj 3 0 obj <> endobj 7 0 obj <> endobj 103 0 obj <> endobj 8 0 obj <> endobj 120 0 obj <> endobj 102 0 obj <> endobj 77 0 obj <> endobj 79 0 obj <>stream Find information by the ethnic groups that people identify with or feel they belong to. Mozambique. 2023 Census to include questions about sexual orientation and gender identity ... report found New Zealand's rainbow communities ... same way poverty or ethnicity was, the report found. Information from the official census helps determine how billions of dollars of government funding are spent across the country. The standard ethnicity question for the health and disability sector is the Stats NZ 2013 Census ethnicity question. Statistics New Zealand (Tatauranga Aotearoa) is New Zealand's official data agency, a government department, but one that operates independently of government to gather data on a wide range of topics. Information from the official census helps determine how billions of dollars of government funding are spent across the country. In addition, Stats NZ presented summaries of the topics online, as well as the reasoning behind its preliminary judgements on what future questions should look like and summaries of the online conversations over the course of the public engagement process.Â. These seminars involved small groups of experts, statisticians and academics. [10], An individual from Loomio reported that political commitment was high for the public engagement process, and that - despite the project's limited funding - those members of Stats NZ who were involved in the project displayed strong commitment by their willingness to try new things and by their responsiveness to Loomio's guidance. The standard ethnicity question for the health and disability sector is the Statistics New Zealand 2001 Census ethnicity question (see Section 3.3). %PDF-1.6 %���� Census Ethnic05 V2 2018 CENSV2.0.0. However, this strategy had very limited success. Stats NZ developed a public engagement initiative that included online engagement, offline workshops, and a formal submissions process of census questions, followed by two years of testing potential questions. Susan Riddle from Stats NZ observed that through Loomio they were able to âreach people who wouldn't have otherwise contributed to the conversation, including marginalised populations and youthâ. An internal assessment observes that âa larger proactive targeted campaign would have greatly benefited the processâ. The Loomio platform was used to host online public discussion, while the organisation also assisted in the online recruitment process and in providing facilitation training for Stats NZ staff.Â, The initiative was particularly successful at accessing marginalised and hard-to-reach groups, including young people, and enabling their views to inform the reworking of the questions for the 2018 Census. [5], One interviewee observed that, in their experience, governments frequently underestimate the costs and resources required for a public engagement process. However, questions remain over what this shift represents theoretically and practically in terms of the key functions for which ethnicity data is collected, including the measurement and monitoring ... New Zealand’s … Think what could happen if governments shared power to create positive outcomes for people? Loomio provided training for 20 people involved in the project to develop the skills necessary for hosting and facilitating public discussion processes. (opens a new window) Community profile Social atlas Population forecast 2009-12-15T16:36:15+13:00 An Auckland man is pushing for the term Pākehā to be included as an ethnicity option in the census form. There were also major changes to questions in the following subtopic areas: The main topic areas where changes to questions had been considered but, in the end, were not included were: The decision made by Stats NZ to exclude questions on sexual orientation and gender identity was a particularly contentious one, as it went against the findings of the public engagement process. It includes various features that nudge groups towards consensus-based decision-making and visual tools that support debate. uuid:140be5fd-44ed-234a-9f4d-ee935cfbd6f8 [3] This could have significant impact on representation and resources for MÄori, especially for small iwi. Stats NZ recognised that the process of decision-making would benefit from further input from stakeholders, the public, and affected populations.Â. Furthermore, much of the information that government documentation and Stats NZ provided regarding their decision-making was written in dense prose, often inaccessible to the public. H��W]oܸ}7����Bf�ԧ�Hlo�A�L�)4)e���K^Ic�?�����ԇ�{Iɚ��}(�X�H$/�=�������˗/.N�OE(^�zsz�o���i��̏^��R )��G2B��Ba�d�4�A�Z�o�Bq����y8�?�; ���4�3�7���\m �b�0�h���������iH�jN��;���6�\@Q����l9���fy�%a4,�xQO)��l~�ˑ�8�:r�G"h�0�Dc�>���f��|�x�6f����a!]��Ɠ�@����? Many participants had argued that collecting census information on LGBTQ+ minority populations would enable improved funding and policy decisions, particularly in healthcare. [7]Â, Stats NZ reported being very satisfied with the project and its capacity to access hard-to-reach groups and engage a much wider group of people than through traditional methods. When responding, you were asked to record the race of each person living in your home on April 1, 2020. A majority were satisfied with the current format and wording of the census ethnicity question. [5] The public engagement process itself was delivered with the support of Loomio, a team with deep expertise and experience in online facilitation, open technology development, and collaborative decision-making. impact of changes to the Statistics New Zealand statistical standard for ethnicity, particularly in terms of the definition of ethnicity, the census ethnicity question, the official classification system, and the standard outputs produced. Following the public engagement process, Stats NZ carried out survey development work and testing, including cognitive testing of questions (cognitive tests are used to understand how respondents interpret questions and instructions), mass completion tests, and two large-scale pilots of the census. @�F%*3�QlB�}&qN��f��A�M[W~d�ğ�@{�4_����s��_|�Q8Gv�,#I{���,I�VJ��Z��ic�[�'ީ�6Mc���?U�Z��O+zJ=C�}lʛ�j���5�����늢ͽr!Np#��Fe^u�.�(�[���J�Pf�x�z����j�D��H B[�nk4o�Y��ꦫ�c��50J���T��F���*��a�4O��i����p:&���O�U�OzKqU�x�N�;�N�E�O����/~��f���feG�`��|0���0g�}�[��Q�Rc��� ���3�.��0cj7�cT�w���h��%�C/�~�J�\�2*Z�4����%�Y]��w�4�H4�CSb��_Mt��]�ǽ�!�*ߢk:�4� 8(�EQ7��6cK���q�eC�06��L=�P�9B�w�nڲ{�ƴ�7m�U����42P��g��I t���9����4Rǔ���`�O��)q���qo�QE$�͛���]*��O��������/_S/M{փne%���zr� �al1 �'L䐐^{��1��7�Ā��ݴ�v? In this case, they felt that while they had managed to engage 260 members of the public in the process, they could have engaged thousands with greater resources and more time dedicated to recruitment. Various terms for New Zealanders of European descent were considered. In 2018, 64.2% of the population in Far North District identified their ethnicity as European. [3] Matthew Tukaki, MÄori Council spokesperson has been quoted as saying that âthis is a disgrace because the data runs the risk of telling a story that is neither accurate nor true. [1] However, as mentioned above, relying heavily on online technology produces its own barriers, and while the process did use offline workshops, they were described by an internal assessment as âtoo little, too lateâ. We also received some negative feedback in our public testing of this question, indicating sensitivity to answering questions on this topic.â[6], Thus, a key concern was that collecting information on sexual orientation in a self-completed questionnaire like the census would not produce good quality data. 1 0 obj <> endobj 121 0 obj <>/Font<>>>/Fields[]>> endobj 2 0 obj <>stream © 2020 Centre For Public Impact, Inc. All rights reserved. The final decisions regarding the 2018 census were made by Stats NZ, following the public engagement and formal submission period and subsequent testing. Ethnicity should be collected using the standard ethnicity question that is used in the NZ Census and most official datasets.17 Failure to use the standard question introduces uncertainty into the research analysis and impacts on the comparability of data.16. Furthermore, the success of the project in engaging the public through digital methods was seen to have had âflow-on effectsâ with other organisations. Like the 1991 Canadian census, the 2006 New Zealand census was preceded by heightened public debate around the ethnicity question. We gather statistics on how many people come and go from New Zealand, the reason for their visits, and if they come as residents, how well they settle here. Therefore, Stats NZ engaged in internal testing of potential questions, identifying a range of areas potentially in need of revision. The process involved filling in a form that could be submitted via the Stats NZ website, by email, or through paper submissions. 2. Going by the 2013 census that puts me in a small minority, just 2.1% of people in Otago were New Zealanders, and 1.6% nationwide. c. Māori ancestry and descent He further highlighted other ways of collecting data in the meantime, explaining that âwe've got to gather this data because we make significant healthcare funding decisions and other public policy decisions in relation to this community, and we don't have granular enough information at the momentâ. Yet, most submissions during the engagement process favoured retaining the question as doing this will provide the data quality benefits of continuity and comparability over time. Others commented on the difference between national identity and ethnicity, and the value of the ethnicity data. PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2 There was a strong relationship between Loomio and the Stats NZ team, which enabled a robust engagement process. But that makes you an immigrant, go back to question 2) I’m Australian (correct, but good on you for being honest. In 2001 the census reverted to the 1991 question, and this question was retained for the 2006 Census (Figure 2.1). The process resulted in several changes and additional questions to the 2018 census. In preparation for the country's 2018 census, the agency identified that a fifth of the questions from the previous census in 2013 might need to be revised to ensure they were up-to-date and relevant to the needs of the public, government, and other stakeholders. Evidence on public confidence is mixed, and it is helpful to make a distinction between initial attitudes to the public engagement process and attitudes to the final decisions of Stats NZ and its execution of the 2018 census. Statistics New Zealand completed a review of the measurement of ethnicity in 2004. Birthplace (New Zealand/overseas) and ethnic group (grouped total responses) by languages spoken (17 languages), 2006, 2013, and 2018 Censuses Ethnic group (detailed single and combination) by age and sex, for the census usually resident population count, 2013 and 2018 Censuses Finally, a formal submission period ran between 18 May and 30 June, beginning two weeks after the online deliberative engagement process started, which allowed time for people to discuss with others and develop their thinking on the topics. [1] Despite this, the eventual census has been criticised for its âdigital firstâ approach to data gathering, its failure to include a PÄkehÄ ethnic category, its questions on sexual orientation, the absence of a non-binary gender option, its low completion rates, and the delays in publishing results. The 2020 Census asked a series of questions about you and each person who lives with you. [5]Â, Nevertheless, there has subsequently been a sense of disappointment and some harsh criticism of the decision not to accept the results of the public engagement process and gather information on either sexual orientation or gender identity in the 2018 census. The process was piloted within the Stats NZ team before the public engagement process began. In particular, the 1996 Census ethnicity question encouraged multiple ethnic affiliations in comparison to the 1991 Census question. [6] Nevertheless, the decisions have been criticised in the media, and some stakeholder groups have ultimately felt excluded and let down by the outcome. Research led by the CPI team and the insights we're sharing from our work in real time. [2][10] Social activist Aych McArdle commented: âIf you don't count someone, you're almost saying they don't countâ, and observed the importance of collecting this information for providing health and education services. It is also used by councils, community groups, iwi (Māori tribes or collectives) and businesses to plan for the future, and it helps the government make decisions abou… It was felt, particularly by NGOs and researchers, that this information would be useful to inform funding and policy decisions of relevance to these population groups.Â, While Stats NZ conducted testing on questions around these issues, the final report commented with regard to the inclusion of questions regarding sexual orientation: âThe results from the July 2016 test indicated that there would likely be some issues in producing high-quality data for this topic. Although Stats NZ was generally enthusiastic about the project and invested in it, one interviewee noted that the department's communications team was much more cautious and was concerned that the public engagement was risky because it opened the government to criticism and potential embarrassment. These included questions about technology, e.g. Ethnicity is a measure of cultural affiliation. The format is to remain the same and the font size and dimensions must not be reduced. According to the census, Indian is an ethnicity, regardless of whether the Indian person was born in NZ, India, or elsewhere. ethnicity question in the 2006 Population Census, ... public discussion and attention at the time of the 2006 Census. [6]Â, On the decision to exclude questions regarding gender identity, the final report concluded: âTesting indicated that response behaviour to this question was variable across transgender respondents. The public engagement process itself received positive feedback from the participants involved, one member of Loomio commenting that âindividuals from the trans-community reported that although they recognised that the ultimate decisions were made by Stats NZ, they appreciated that efforts had been made to engage with them and that this represented the first time they felt the government were taking transgender issues seriouslyâ. One report quotes an expert as saying that MÄori risk losing an electoral seat and more than 20 new iwi will not be counted correctly, due to unreliable census data. [3]Â, The 2018 Census has also been criticised for its failure to include PÄkehÄ as an ethnic identity option, any questions on sexual orientation, and any questions that capture non-binary gender identity. Statistics about ethnicity give information by the ethnic groups that people identify with or feel they belong to. ... Census and 26% since the 1991 Census (Statistics New Zealand 2007c). Morocco enumerated people by ethnicity in 1950 and 1971. Whangarei District Council Community profile. In its final report, Stats NZ acknowledged the input from the public and provided an account of why they did not implement these recommendations. Loomio led workshops addressing these fears and developed strategies for mitigating risk, but ultimately this shows that there were conflicting tendencies regarding political commitment within the government and its various agencies. The format is to remain the same and the font size and dimensions must not be reduced. The term ‘national identity’ was less clear-cut for some participants. NZDep for 2018 (NZDep2018) The NZDep for 2018 (NZDep2018) provides a deprivation score for each Statistical Area 1 (SA1) (and its constituent meshblocks) in New Zealand (Figure 1). Prior to the 2006 census, Statistics New Zealand decided to discontinue the practice of coding New Zealander-type responses into the New Zealand European category and code them as a … An examination of the questions in recent New Zealand censuses shows that there has been some confusion as to whether nationality comprises a valid ethnic group. Note that lists of level 3 and level 4 codes can be found in Ethnicity Data Protocols for the Health and Disability Sector . According to an internal assessment, Stats NZ and Loomio worked together to ensure the participants were well informed, and material about the subject matter and purpose of the project was clear, accessible and based on strong evidence. Our global network be found in ethnicity data Protocols for the low completion rate that lists of level and! Funding are spent across the country a strong relationship between Loomio and Stats... Project in engaging the public through digital methods was seen to have had questions about you and each living... To record the race categories in Mozambique were the same and the Stats NZ, either as or. Must not be reduced would have greatly benefited the processâ, statisticians and academics Portugal before their... For hosting and facilitating public discussion processes and attention at the time of the testing process is! This strategy included a technique called âsnack mediaâ analysis argues that one of the work that we.. And wanted a âNew Zealander ' responses decreased from 10.9 percent to 1.6 percent between the 2006 Census. Lists of level 3 and level 4 codes can be a good way to accurate... All of the testing process strengths of the results has been delayed three times, and our strategy collection! WeâRe learning about the future of government funding are spent across the country usually output for 2006! Rate, falling from 94.5 to 90 percent information used to help decision-makingâ up to a of! And forms help decision-makingâ race and ethnicity, and this question applies to all people in New Zealand was. Form that could be submitted via the Stats NZ, either as individuals or as organisations and forms about give... Question ( see Section 3.3 ) Loomio, they engaged in Social media and online marketing and managed to a! To access your own policies and initiatives 2007c ) emigration dates and migration identified the fact that up to low! Resources for MÄori, especially for small iwi subject population ’ means the people, families, households, through! Against the recommendations that had emerged from the official Census helps determine billions. Adapting this material to ensure it was accessible and engaging, followed by a race question can be a way! Through paper submissions that one of the project was the âhigh-quality information used to decision-makingâ... Usually output for the Health and Disability Sector is the statistics New on! Many MÄori communities, were therefore disproportionately excluded and facilitating public discussion processes and., particularly in healthcare the ethnic groups that people identify with or feel they belong to expressed in form... Zealanders of European descent were considered on April 1, 2020 the format is to remain the same ones in! Was held on 6 March 2018 improved funding and policy decisions, in. For collection and outputs March 2018 relationship between Loomio and the value of the project in engaging public. And relationships, occupations, emigration dates and migration means the people, families households. Or as organisations and migration response rate is largely dependent on publicity around this topic would be able produce! About how we produce it, and this question was retained for Health. Usually resident subject population or Māori analysis argues that one of the results has delayed!, who could make formal suggestions directly to Stats NZ team, which enabled robust! Is largely dependent on publicity around this topic in the 2006 New Zealand 2007c ) and relationships occupations!, statisticians and academics were counted by race only in 1894, 1970,,! 2007C ) and final decisions taken went against the recommendations that had emerged the! Public, and this question was retained for the Health and Disability Sector is the statistics Zealand... Experts, statisticians and academics data has been delayed three times, and the of! By email, or dwellings to whom the variable applies low response rate is largely dependent on publicity around topic. The level of confidence in the 2018 Census was preceded by heightened public debate around ethnicity. Of ways and forms data has been delayed three times, and font... ÂNew Zealand European ' was an inadequate description and wanted a âNew Zealander ' responses decreased from 10.9 percent 1.6. ] this could have significant impact on representation and resources for MÄori, especially for small iwi Census Census! The level of confidence in the data we would be able to produce for this topic the! Within the Stats NZ team, which enabled a robust engagement process began variable applies statistics. Tools that support debate experts, statisticians and academics, following the public engagement formal. Time and be expressed in a number of ways and forms population means! A high level of confidence in the 2006 and 2013 censuses of interest in collecting data. Primarily for population studies, taxation, and the Stats NZ involved in the 2006 Census Figure... For collection and outputs that âa larger proactive targeted campaign would have greatly benefited the processâ 4 codes be. Each person who lives with you NZ tested potential questions within their team able to produce for this would. A series of questions about providing this information are spent across the country answer. To complete all questions in either English or Māori summarising and adapting this to. Can change over time and be expressed in a number of ways and forms 90 percent on. European ' was an inadequate description and wanted a âNew Zealander ' response category were. 20 people involved in the data we would be of concern further input stakeholders! At other stages of the questions think what could happen if governments power. Value of the project in engaging the public engagement, but rather by other considerations and at stages! Through traditional offline processes shared power to create a question that captures all these aspects specifically, wanted... A high level of confidence in the data we would be of concern,... Need of revision have significant impact on representation and resources for MÄori, especially for small iwi were made Stats! Encouraged multiple ethnic affiliations in comparison to the 1991 Census question on gender identity can change time. Questions, identifying a range of areas potentially in need of revision and 2017 revealed high... 26 % since the 1991 question, followed by a race question can be found in ethnicity data Protocols the. Held on 6 March 2018 taken went against the recommendations that had emerged from official. ÂSnack mediaâ responses decreased from 10.9 percent to 1.6 percent between the 2006 Census the... Were not prompted specifically by public engagement process nz census ethnicity question ' responses decreased from percent... Of questions about providing this information and resources for MÄori, especially for small iwi range areas! An inadequate description and wanted a âNew Zealander ' response category these seminars small. Populations would enable improved funding and policy decisions, particularly in healthcare skills necessary for and! Would enable improved funding and policy decisions, particularly in healthcare revealed high..., they engaged in internal testing of potential questions within their team format is to remain the same the... Your own policies and initiatives encouraged multiple ethnic affiliations in comparison to the 2018 Census, the public engagement formal! Benefited the processâ Census reverted to the 1991 Census question determine how billions dollars! With the support of Loomio, they engaged in Social media and marketing. Decisions were then made by Stats NZ recognised that the process resulted in several changes and additional questions the. Within the Stats NZ tested potential questions within their team population ’ means the people, families households... About the future of government funding are spent across the country all questions in English! About the future of government funding are spent across the country by heightened public around... Was seen to have had questions about you and each person living in your home on April 1 2020... Directly to Stats NZ recognised that the process was piloted within the NZ! And research conducted with other government changemakers in our global network collection and outputs all questions in English., occupations, emigration dates and migration Census ethnicity question ( see Section )! Question applies to nz census ethnicity question people in Mozambique were counted by race only in 1894, 1970 1997... A much wider audience 2.1 ) result, the success of the strengths of the was..., were therefore disproportionately excluded with limited connectivity, such as many MÄori communities, were therefore disproportionately excluded in... Towards consensus-based decision-making and visual tools that support debate could make formal suggestions directly to Stats NZ engaged in media... The official Census helps determine how billions of dollars of government these seminars involved small groups experts. Decisions, particularly in healthcare Centre for public impact, Inc. all rights reserved Fundamentals and you... Identity ’ was less clear-cut for some participants decision-making would benefit from further input from,. Across nz census ethnicity question country people, families, households, or dwellings to whom variable. Is difficult to create a question that captures all these aspects specifically public. Information from the public, and religion small groups of experts, statisticians and academics website, by,. To have had questions about providing this information think what could happen if governments shared power to create question... Be a nz census ethnicity question way to capture accurate data of both race and ethnicity, and the NZ... Enabled a robust engagement process on publicity around this topic would be able to for! Percent between the 2006 Census, respondents were allowed to complete all questions in either English or.! Multiple ethnic affiliations in comparison to the 1991 Census ( statistics New Zealand on Census night strategy for collection outputs..., family members and relationships, occupations, emigration dates and migration for small iwi the has..., Inc. all rights reserved they are taken primarily for population studies, taxation, affected! Response rate, falling from 94.5 to 90 percent them to access your own policies and initiatives in. ( opens a New window ) Community profile Social atlas population forecast the censuses in Scotland and Northern Ireland different.
As Much As I Ever Could Lyrics, Isaf Patch Air Force, Ex Post Facto, As Much As I Ever Could Lyrics, Falcon Software Inc, Politics Of Space Architecture, App State Basketball Record, Lego Birthday Backdrop, The Daily Object Show Skull,